Where to start? Where to start? I suppose with a plot synopsis. This will be a difficult movie to review without peppering this post with spoilers, but I will do my best.
Jane Eyre follows the life of the girl by the same name--from her dark, cold childhood at Gateshead Hall and Lowood School, to her coming to Thornfield Hall as a governess, Jane shows considerable pluck, passion, and courage. Thornfield is a strange house indeed, as Jane soon learns. From the mad sewing-woman: Grace Poole, to Mr. Rochester himself (Master of Thornfield Hall) there are secrets abounding--secrets that threaten to upset Jane's hopes of ever being loved and accepted.Will Jane find happiness in the end, through all the difficulties that are thrown in her way?There. That is the best I can do at a synopsis, as there are some major events that would be plot-spoilers if I mentioned them. :P
This movie was made in 1983 so I will warn you--the costumes are horrid and the filming horrider. At times it looks like a stage rather than a movie. But the singular thing about Jane Eyre (and the thing that has endeared this version to me more than any other I've seen) is the passionate, riveting acting. Timothy Dalton and Zelah Clarke are such amazing actors that they could have been standing on a sidewalk and given just as good of a performance. Costumes and setting didn't matter. All you see is them.
--Her--
Zelah Clarke as Jane Eyre is astonishing. (in a good way.) She owns the character in a way that makes you think she really is Jane. There cannot be another Jane. All other attempts have been impostors and that is all. Zelah Clarke gives Jane a certain sweetness that I felt drastically missing in the other version and bits I've seen. Yes, she has had a difficult, stern childhood. Yes,she is wronged. (again and again) But she has not been embittered. Zelah's portrayal of Jane is winsome, grave, and ineffably sweet to counter the necessary strength and passion of her character. She is perfection. (And she has adorable dimples.) But beyond all this, perhaps the best part of this Jane is that she so stinkin' tiny. I'm guessing she is no taller than four and a half feet. So that when we come to Mr. Rochester...![]() |
| "Are you dumb?...stubborn?...ahh....you are annoyed." |
--Him--
I have heard that Timothy Dalton is best known for being James Bond. Excuse me while I die of painful laughter. I know him as Mr. Edward Rochester and only as Mr. Rochester. *Tosses laptop to the side to watch proposal scene and will be back later* Oh my goodness. My heart is melting. Entirely. Gah!Ahem. Back to business. Timothy Dalton played Mr. Rochester's rugged, passionate, not-entirely-tame personality very well. He has an unearthly look about him anyway that lends itself to his Rochesterian-ess.
Physically, there is this pushmepullyou business going on in my mind that only increases the ideal of Timothy Dalton as Rochester. He is plain and ugly and he is tearingly handsome. He is intimidating and he is gentle. He is kind one moment and practically bites Jane's head off the next. It is this pendulum effect that makes him so fascinating. But one of the curious things about Jane Eyre is that Mr. Rochester is not exactly heroic. At least, not till the end. But we don't speak of that. All you need to know is that Jane--her virtue and heroism and loyalty--makes for the real "hero" of this story.
--Them--
The emotion, passion, wit, and drama between Jane and Mr. Rochester (especially between this version of the famous couple) never ceases to delight me. And in this version, Jane is so tiny and Mr. Rochester is so strong and tall that it plays up ever more the big heart and virtue that is Jane's. I mean girls--one of Mr. Rochester's hands is nearly enough to cover Jane's entire head. He messes up her hair every time he crushes her in one of his huge, rough hugs. It is hilarious and touching and perfect. You know how there can be...well..(for lack of a better term) chemistry between two actors? It's here. It's here big time. In fact, given that they had 5 and a half hours to play it out, I think that they became Jane and Mr. Rochester.
Cons:
Without giving too much away, there are a couple things I should mention as cautions. One, the little girl Jane comes to Thornfield to educate is never explained. Is she Mr. Rochester's illegitimate daughter? Truth is, he himself doesn't really know. That's thing one.
Thing two is that there is a "fortune-telling" scene. Of course the gypsy turns out to be one of the familiar characters in the movie and a sham-performance, but there is the suggestion that some of the characters would have believed a "real" fortune-teller.
Thing three is the definite, indisputable fact that this movie is eerie in places. I can't explain why. It's all part of the Unmentionable Secret, but it has to do with a singular, blood-chilling laugh and very mysterious happenings in the house. (It is all natural causes--no ghosts, haints, or chillin' things. ;)
Pros:
You are in tears by the end of a Certain Scene where Jane must make a heart-wrenching decision between purity and virtue and the only love she has ever known. She makes the right choice, and you are reeling by the end. Seriously, it's the most intense scene you will ever watch in a movie. It really makes you think whether you would have the fortitude. I promise you'll be weeping if you have any heart.
Again, I cannot spill the beans all over the carpet, but everything ends just as it ought. If Charlotte Bronte had lived in the world of today's modern story-lines, Jane Eyre would probably have turned out to be just another compromise. But with a turn of Bronte's pen, she put everything right.
The ending is not entirely, perfectly, un-markedly happy, but it ends as it ought. It ends right, and that is all one can wish for. :)
Quotables:
*ahhhh* this movie is so full of brilliant quotes and you know what? I could only find one (an entirely random one, at that) online. Rats in a poke. I suppose you will have to watch it yourself to experience just the best of the best dialog in movie history! (Pssst! The proposal scene is the best *ever*. If you want to watch the film entirely out of order, you can watch the scene here.)













Ah I hope this one made you happier than the new film, I was left quite disappointed. I am a huge fan of the book and felt that the directors and writers could have payed a bit more attention to the way I saw it in my head Oh well. Also the story was lacking which was also very disappointing, how could they leave out the mystery of the wife ? and the terror she evokes. I shall have to see this version maybe I will like it more
ReplyDeleteare you fond of the novel ?
blessings
Rachel Hope
I'VE SEEN IT!
ReplyDeleteThere, how's that? You can add one more person to your list.
Actually, I've seen every single version of Jane Eyre, right after I finished the book, stretched out in a few weeks--yikes. That's like 9 versions. But I was reviewing them all for my Jane Eyre series a while back--haha. It was my Jane Eyre fill for a while. Indubitably. Well, I didn't watch all of the 1973 one--actually hardly any, and ditto with the 1930s one. (Ha. Ha. Ha. That version was Pathetic. It can hardly even be CALLED a version.)
Anyways. This version isn't my favorite... but I think it's the best mini-series. Yes, better than the 2006 version. Which I, in fact, did not see all of. (That I wasn't allowed to is sort of beside the point here.) I'm not satisfied with ANY of the adaptations--sigh. The book is so much better than any of them! But this is probably the closest to the book. But Jane...was too old. Rochester...eh, sorry, I didn't like him overly well, but I certainly didn't hate him as Some People do. ;) I actually liked the cast in the newest one (and they paid attention to hair color!!! Am I the only one who gets tired of blonde-haired Miss Ingrams?) but it was far too short and confusing and would only be good for people who already know the story. And of course cutting out the painting scenes. Which I did. ;-) Of course, I heard all the BAD things about it BEFORE I watched it, so was more inclined to notice any good things. :P But I should probably stop talking about that version or you might not like me.
Actually, I should probably stop talking in general. I might scare you with my long comment since I've never even commented on this blog before... heh. Anyways, hi! I'm Melody from Regency Delight ~Jane Austen, etc.~, famous (infamous?) for prattling on and on in the comment box! How are you?
Heehee.
;-)
Nice to hear from you, Melody! :) (And no, I don't mind long comments. :) I do agree that Jane is older than 18 (quite a bit) but I appreciated the fact that she did not pout. :P
ReplyDelete@Rachel Hope, it's been a while since I've read the book (Horrors! I don't own it!)but from what I remember it is much closer to the book than the 2011 version. I really didn't enjoy the whole flash-back thing, and yes: the fact that they hardly mentioned Mr. Rochester's wife was awful.
I do think you would be very satisfied with this version, if you care to watch it! (I liked it anyway. :)
Ooh, now I want to see this version! Zelah Clarke doesn't look quite the way I've pictured Jane, but Timothy Dalton appears to be spot-on for Mr. Rochester... I don't like Toby Stephens' looks AT ALL in the 2006 version. I haven't seen any JE movies yet, though, so I really can't judge. But if you recommended this, Rachel, I'll put it on my to-watch list! :D
ReplyDeleteHi, i never read this book when younger- more's the pity, but i have become somewhat obsessed since studying it at uni as a mature aged student. it would have to be my favourite book ever( so far anyway!) . JE is an amazingly strong and independent character for the time. i wish i had her strength when i was 18 years old! ER is a fascinating character too- not immediately likable but , with some wisdom of years, i can see how the reality of his situation has shaped him and his choices for the times were , in their own way , coming from a good place. we all have our flaws and inconsistencies. It is a bit of a good girl changes the rebel / bad boy's ways kind of story that is appealing to women of all ages i guess! I have to admit to having watched far too many versions of JE recently in order to feed my escapist obsession, and i have to agree that the 1983. version is my fave, closely followed by the 1973 version as they both contain more of the crackling rochester and jane dialogue than any others i have seen. the book needs more than a 2 hour movie to do it justice. I think zelah clarke pulls of being 18 years old very well and dalton ,although handsome by todays standards , does not fit the blond Apollo looks that were revered in men of the 1830s, so he is in keeping with brontes description from the book. great performances by both leads that manage to make you forget the 1980s style of production.i didnt like the 2006 ultra sensual leaving scene- that just didnt happen in the book- it was a far more tortured affair as per 73/ 83 versions. i also dont likethe use of arty visuals in later versions to portray emotional/ psychological events like mrs reeds dislike of jane- again the dialogue and superior acting can do it better. also loved st john in 83 version it really shows the temptation he offered JE to travel, and maybe even marry him due to her strong religious convictions- the same resolute ones that drove her away from ERs indecent proposal in the first place. young actors in 83 version are also excellent.although this 83 version is missing some of my favourite bits from the book eg: some of janes passionate lines in the proposal scene ( the automaton and living water etc lines should always be included in my mind- sorcha cussack 73 just pips clarke in this scene for passion akin to the child JE surfacing again) and i do think a final kiss in the last proposal scene at ferndean would not have gone astray! all that said i know i will watch the dalton and clarke chemistry over and over again just as i read my favourite ER and JE scenes over and over again from the book. Thanks for the blog and letting me chat with another JE devotee! By the way, if you find any deleted scenes from this version where ER picks JE up onto his horse when she runs to meet him post stressing out about the wedding veil incident- i would love to get my hands on it. there are shots of dalton and clarke on the horse together but i sm starting to think they are just promotional photos. loved that sequence in the book! Thanks again! Kahtin :)
ReplyDelete